Thesis Research of Beret Dickson, graduate student at the University of Maryland School of Architecture, Planning, and Preservation

8.30.2008

Democratization

Premise:
The single, fundamental drive of an individual is survival. As such, our lives are ordered by the dual needs for food (immediate survival of the individual) and sex (long-term survival of the species). In contemporary culture, the three primary resources for survival are food, water, and energy.

According to Karl Marx, political power is dependent upon control over the means and methods of production. For example, a capitalist system places control in the hands of the individual, while a communist system in the hands of a ruling elite. Thus, an individual that is unable to control the production of his own primary survival resources is effectively rendered powerless.

    Proposal:
In our current political/economic system, people do not have the leverage or space to maneuver for political, economic, or social change because they depend upon that system for their primary means of survival - food, energy, and water. Our dependance upon the grid [food, water, and energy production and distribution] to which we are attached forces us to accept it, regardless of its inefficiencies, inequalities, and environmental effects.

But what if we were able to detach ourselves from the grid and from the systems of production, distribution, and control that curtails the grassroots foundations of a democratic state? What if individuals were given the infrastructure in which to produce their own food, water, and energy and, consequently, the space and leverage to rally against the controlling bureaucracies?

The Future Farm will be the vehicle through which individuals reclaim their independence from the corporate-controlled systems that dictate their very means of survival. Control over what, when, and how will shift from the elite few to the empowered many. As such The Future Farm will be a catalyst for political action, as the newly empowered populace, removed from the yoke of controlling bureaucracies, will have the leverage to demand social and economic change.

1 comment:

kthaulass said...

Nice proposal. This is going to be a great thesis. I liked the proposal most because it was straight forward ie. I understood it. The post about program looks interesting as well but I was unable to maximize the images and this couldn't get any deeper than what you've written. Anyway, have you read any Christopher Alexander? What did you think?